Contact: +91-9711224068
  • Printed Journal
  • Indexed Journal
  • Refereed Journal
  • Peer Reviewed Journal
NAAS Journal
International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition
Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol. 7, Issue 5, Part B (2025)

Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of different tillage-based crop production systems

Author(s):

Komal Parikh and Chhaya Tyagi

Abstract:

Leading soil scientists have argued that shifting tillage practices could be the single most cost-effective strategy for reducing agriculture’s carbon footprint. This research quantified energy inputs, outputs, and greenhouse gas emissions across four tillage systems—conventional (CT), reduced (RT), minimum (MT), and zero tillage (ZT)—in a rice-wheat rotation at Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India, over three years (2021–24). A randomized block design with four treatments and four replications was used. Energy input decreased progressively from CT (18.4 GJ ha⁻¹) to ZT (8.6 GJ ha⁻¹), a 53.3% reduction. Energy use efficiency improved from 2.33 (CT) to 4.43 (ZT). Total carbon footprint declined from 1,271.9 kg CO₂-eq ha⁻¹ (CT) to 735.5 kg CO₂-eq ha⁻¹ (ZT), mainly due to lower diesel consumption and elimination of residue burning. Grain yield under ZT was 6.8% lower than CT in the first year but the gap narrowed to 3.1% by year three. A composite sustainability index combining energy efficiency, carbon footprint, and yield ranked ZT first, followed by MT, RT, and CT.

Pages: 91-94  |  328 Views  130 Downloads


International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition
How to cite this article:
Komal Parikh and Chhaya Tyagi. Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of different tillage-based crop production systems. Int. J. Agric. Nutr. 2025;7(5):91-94. DOI: 10.33545/26646064.2025.v7.i5b.558